Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 December 28

< December 27	December 29 >

December 28

File:Westphalia wappen.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality JPEG of image now to be found at commons:File:Blason Jérôme Bonaparte (1784-1860).svg OwenBlacker (Talk) 00:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, File:Blason Jérôme Bonaparte (1784-1860).svg is a good replacement. Reh man 10:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lupusfoot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced to a 1941 work from India with no author specified...Indian copyright law says their works remain under copyright for 60 years after death of copyright holder.[1] Replaceable by free image. Kelly ^hi! 09:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn - image has now been sourced to Reginald Innes Pocock, who died more than 60 years ago. Moving image to Commons. Kelly ^hi! 17:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SimonC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot from a movie - copyright violation Lukasz Lukomski (talk) 15:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Reh man 10:24, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Serbian Migrations to Croatia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map showing the migration of Serbs moving to Croatia in the 15th century. It is tagged with {{PD-old-100}}, but no source is given to support the claim that the author died over 100 years ago. Note that the map uses Helvetica (a typeface created in 1957) and shows the modern borders of Croatia (compare Subdivisions of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and see [2], which says that the modern borders of Croatia were not fixed until after the Second World War). So it seems that the {{PD-old-100}} tag is false, and thus we have no source or licensing information for this map. —Bkell (talk) 16:08, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Unused. Reh man 10:26, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Haydonschoolwebsite.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot of a school’s Web site. —Bkell (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Reh man 10:34, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Luke255.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal logo. —Bkell (talk) 16:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Reh man 10:34, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hl2 2006-07-21 23-54-12-73.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot of Counter-Strike: Source, which I assume is proprietary software not available under a free license (though I don't see information about this one way or the other in the article). —Bkell (talk) 16:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BobGrant.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a promotional image without metadata. Uploader has a history of uploading images with improper licenses. Karppinen (talk) 16:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lion with a crown; representing the 51st & Ada chapter of the Latin Kings.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader, who has a history of uploading copyright violations, has released the file into the public domain, but there is no more information about the photograph. Karppinen (talk) 16:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Founders3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Small image without metadata from camera. Uploader has a history of uploading copyright violations. Karppinen (talk) 16:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kawasaki Ninja Logo-Square.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. As I understand it, this is PD-text, and so the whole argument is moot. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a photo I took of the Ninja logo on my motorcycle. Administrators have removed my copyright and given it to the company (Kawasaki Heavy Industries) who made the product I photographed. Additionally, my name has been removed from the work. I wish to have my photo removed from Wikipedia or have my name added to the File history and my copyright with a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License re-instated on the photo. mattofwashington (talk) 21:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It would help here if we could link to an explanation of why photos logos (alone) on objects like vehicles are not free -- Wikipedia:Logos doesn't mention it specifically. See also Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 November 26.

Personally, I don't see how the article Kawasaki Ninja meets the criteria in Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. But if Wikipedia can use this logo, then we would want to replace the current one with an example that better meets the criteria for logos anyway, such as the GIF here. This would moot Mattofwashington's request to either CC license his photo or delete it and all would be well. --Dbratland (talk) 22:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This photo contains the logo alone and not the full image of the bike. So this becomes a derivative work and so the copyright goes to the original copyright owner of the logo. But since this logo is too simple, I believe it cannot be copyrighted. In that case, you can remove the non-free rationale and put {{PD-text}} as the license. Also, if you can upload another photo with the entire bike visible, that photo can be attributed to you. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:59, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - Fonts are not copyrighted...--...Captain......Tälk tö me... 07:26, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fig 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not used. Poor description. Who created the original? MGA73 (talk) 23:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
the original file Fig 1.jpg was renamed after another file took the same name. No problem you can delete the present one. Dingy (talk) 14:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Tagged {{db-author}} per above. Reh man 10:32, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amazigh berber language.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, tagged as hoax. Kelly ^hi! 23:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.